[ATTW-L] Labor based grading contracts in editing course

Joseph Robertshaw jwr0015 at uah.edu
Wed Jul 15 19:44:40 UTC 2020


Hi Hannah,

I have an idea or two for you to consider.

In the Editing course I taught in Spring 2020, I turned my exams into
several quizzes and released them over several weeks. Upon Joy Robinson's
suggestion, I also made them available for multiple attempts. This allowed
students to strive for mastery by retaking the quizzes and then the score
in the end does reflect their labor investment. Alternatively I considered
scrapping the exam in favor of more process documentation (progress
reports, proposals, reflections). Ultimately I combined these approaches
and used half of the exam to create quizzes while increasing the number of
process documents for me to offer feedback on. Converting the quizzes to
Canvas was highly problematic but I think it was worth the initial
investment of effort.

I hope this helps you think about your course in a new way.

Joseph W. Robertshaw



On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:34 PM Bellwoar, Hannah (BELLWOAR) <
BELLWOAR at juniata.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I decided to make the move to labor based grading in all of my classes in
> the fall. However, I am teaching Professional Editing, and I typically give
> a mid-term exam in that course. I cannot wrap my head around how to grade
> an exam based on labor rather than correctness. Any suggestions or ideas
> for me?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Hannah
>
>
>
> Hannah Bellwoar, PhD
>
> Director of Writing
>
> Associate Professor of English
>
> Juniata College
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:* The materials in this electronic mail
> transmission (including all attachments) are private and confidential and
> are the property of the sender. The information contained in the material
> is privileged and is intended only for the use of the named addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended addressee, be advised that any unauthorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this material is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by
> replying to the e-mail, and then destroy it immediately. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> ATTW-L mailing list
> ATTW-L at attw.org
> http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://attw.org/pipermail/attw-l_attw.org/attachments/20200715/d151ea59/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the ATTW-L mailing list