[ATTW-L] two new Communication Design Quarterly online first articles

[Jordan Frith]

Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the publication of two new online first articles
for *Communication
Design Quarterly*. I'm including the article info below, and you can find
full PDFs of the articles  available open access (along with other articles
and the special issue published in May) at *CDQ's* online first page
<https://cdq.sigdoc.org/online-first-articles/>. I hope you enjoy reading
them.

Please consider submitting to *CDQ, *and don't hesitate to reach out to me
as the editor if you have any questions!

StoryMapping community engagement: Reflexive chorography, spatial justice,
and the Carnegie classification for community engagement

by Brian Gogan and John C. Scott

Abstract: Institutions of higher education can use communication design to
more fully realize the transformational potential of applying for the
Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement. In particular,
we contend that chorography is one way that institutions can seek spatial
justice in conjunction with place-based community engagement
understandings. To support this argument, we focus on the location of
community-engaged work as a defining characteristic of that work. We
further process one year’s worth of our home institution’s
community-engaged work by using a three-step research methodology called
chorography, in which we (1) collected community engagement data; (2)
designed a multi-layered community engagement map; and, (3) reflexively
considered the inclusivity and sustainability of our institution’s
community-engaged work. Our aim is to use this map-making method to orient
our institution to more inclusive and more sustainable community-engaged
work.

Collaboration as a shared value: Instructor and student perceptions of
collaborative learning in online business writing courses

by Brigitte Mussack and Jason Tham

Abstract: This article presents a case study of instructor and student
perceptions of collaborative learning in multiple sections of an
upper-level, online business writing course. Our goals are to understand
current attitudes toward collaboration among business writing instructors
and students and to examine points of dissonance regarding attitudes,
frameworks, and definitions of collaborative writing. Further, we aim to
understand how collaboration is valued, how it is framed and valued in
terms of either process or product, and various associations between
collaboration and community. Our results revealed collaboration to be a
shared interest by business writing instructors and students alike but at
the same time it is received differently in online versus in-person
interactions. In this article, we identify these dissonances and discuss
what they mean for collaborative learning.




-- 

Jordan Frith, Ph.D.

Pearce Professor of Professional Communication

Clemson University

Pronouns: He/Him

Editor-in-Chief, *Communication Design Quarterly*

Editor, *The X-Series <https://parlorpress.com/pages/x-series>*, Parlor
Press

My Google Scholar Profile
<https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=OtvmSE0AAAAJ&hl=en>

My personal website <https://jordanfrith.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://attw.org/pipermail/attw-l_attw.org/attachments/20230727/277d321a/attachment-0001.htm>