[ATTW-L] social justice in technical editing texts?

Tue Feb 1 16:57:31 UTC 2022

Just echoing Josie; I'd love to make use of your resources here, ryan, and anything else folks recommend. I ran into the same problem of a discontinued text with Amare et al.'s quite good book a few years ago, and have been making do (including with chapters from that book shared with the authors' permission) ever since.

Cagle

----------------------------------------------

Lauren E. Cagle, PhD

Assistant Professor | Writing, Rhetoric, & Digital Studies, University of Kentucky<https://wrd.as.uky.edu/>

Program Faculty | Environmental and Sustainability Studies, University of Kentucky<https://ens.as.uky.edu/about-faculty>

Affiliate Faculty | Appalachian Studies Program, University of Kentucky<https://appalachiancenter.as.uky.edu/about-studies>

Director & Co-Founder | Kentucky Climate Consortium<https://www.research.uky.edu/climate-consortium>

Pronouns: she/her/hers

University of Kentucky

1351 Patterson Office Tower

lauren.cagle at uky.edu

(859) 257-1115

________________________________
From: ATTW-L <attw-l-bounces at attw.org> on behalf of Josephine Walwema <walwema at uw.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 11:35 AM
To: ryan moeller <rylish.moeller at gmail.com>
Cc: ATTW List serv <attw-l at attw.org>
Subject: Re: [ATTW-L] social justice in technical editing texts?

CAUTION: External Sender

Dear ryan,

I am sorry to hear that the Rude Editing text has been discontinued. I am responding because I am very much interested in resources for editing and I hope folks come through as they always do.

Cheers

Josie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
JOSEPHINE WALWEMA PhD.

Interdisciplinary Writing Program

Department of English | A101 Padelford Hall

[https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/uw-s3-cdn/wp-content/uploads/sites/98/2014/10/07213956/e-sig.gif]
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-9308<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Forcid.org%2F0000-0002-9677-9308&data=04%7C01%7Clauren.cagle%40uky.edu%7Cbcb03cc70efb4310baa008d9e5a1af78%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637793305471937643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=dR173tzYYXBq886V%2FuzNXdYwPAuWU2JcsYa0aRnpMNo%3D&reserved=0>

This is a public, university-owned email account and subject to an Open Records request through the Freedom of Information Act at any time. Correspondence of a personal nature should be sent to: jwalwema at gmail.com<mailto:jwalwema at gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:35 PM ryan moeller <rylish.moeller at gmail.com<mailto:rylish.moeller at gmail.com>> wrote:
hi all,

i’m currently teaching USU’s graduate-level “Advanced Editing” course, and i’ve overhauled it to have a social justice focus. for example, we are talking about ways that an editor acts as a reader advocate or a user experience designer for texts of all sorts and across multiple modalities; instead of style guides, we are investigating social justice focused style guides<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fideasonfire.net%2Fjournal-style-guide%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clauren.cagle%40uky.edu%7Cbcb03cc70efb4310baa008d9e5a1af78%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637793305471937643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ApG1DblnoDgglbro%2Bii9UkzFgfICDzXLqpWWEOXRaiw%3D&reserved=0>; and we are interrogating editing practices (like adherence to “correctness” or “rules") that have been shown not to help struggling writers improve their writing or have been shown to have fallen out of use or favor among various audiences.

back in the before times when i was deciding on course textbooks, i chose Rude & Eaton’s Technical Editing, (5th Edition), for its emphasis on readers’ needs over correctness or grammar rules. the textbook publisher, Pearson, allowed me to place the book order from their website<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pearson.com%2Fus%2Fhigher-education%2Fprogram%2FRude-Technical-Editing-5th-Edition%2FPGM100003100757.html%3Ftab%3Doverview&data=04%7C01%7Clauren.cagle%40uky.edu%7Cbcb03cc70efb4310baa008d9e5a1af78%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637793305471937643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=vSThJ%2BiAx6bFhpsuYCydnQQx%2FIGJYT1K89wd0nz789I%3D&reserved=0> (that in no way indicated then nor does it indicate now that the text has been discontinued), my bookstore didn’t have any problem adopting it, and my students haven’t had trouble purchasing the text. however, i requested an desk copy through the publisher’s website twice, and i received no response. when i contacted my Pearson publishing representative, they told me that since the book is out of date (2014), they would not send me a pdf or electronic version of the publication, nor would they request a desk copy or exam copy for me. their suggestion was to look for a more up-to-date textbook and sent me a link to Pearson’s entire catalog.

leaving the problematics of customer service and maybe the error of my reliance on older publishing models whereby instructors didn’t have to purchase their own textbooks aside, the situation that i find myself in has me thinking that i may have missed some great resources on editing over the last few years. here’s a list of a few that i have become aware of and am using in class to supplement the Rude & Eaton text, but if you know of others, will you please DM me with those resources? i will happily compile a list in my course bibliography and share it with everyone who is interested.

Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices: A heuristic for editors, reviewers, and authors. (2021). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/reviewheuristic<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2Freviewheuristic&data=04%7C01%7Clauren.cagle%40uky.edu%7Cbcb03cc70efb4310baa008d9e5a1af78%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637793305471937643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=BBsAERMBSk%2FxwgBl%2Buhw4NqZtk2Dxno3g10oToXP4eo%3D&reserved=0>.
Baker, M.J., Nightingale, E.M., & Bills, S. (2021). An editing process for blind or visually impaired editors. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(3), 275–287.
Cabezas, P., Spinuzzi, C., Sabaj, O., & Varas, G. (2020). Editing the pitch: Patterns of editing strategies of written pitches in a Chilean accelerator program. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(4), 296–310.
Fisher Saller, C. (2016). The subversive copy editor (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Itchuaqiyaq, C.U., & Walton, R. (2021). Reviewer as activist: Understanding academic review through Conocimiento. Rhetoric Review, 40(4), 378-394.
Jones, N.N., & Williams, M.F. (2017). The social justice of plain language: A critical approach to plain-language analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 412–429.
Meloncon, L. (2019). A Field-Wide View of Undergraduate and Graduate Editing Courses in Technical and Professional Communication Programs, in Editing in the Modern Classroom (pp. 171-191).

i’m also considering whether turning these course materials into a textbook would be helpful to others of you, and whether anyone else is working on Editing for Social Justice projects that i can endorse or support or collaborate on?

thanks!

ryan or rylish moeller

associate professor
technical communication & rhetoric
department of english
utah state university

pronouns: he.him.his

_______________________________________________
ATTW-L mailing list
ATTW-L at attw.org<mailto:ATTW-L at attw.org>
http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fattw.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fattw-l_attw.org&data=04%7C01%7Clauren.cagle%40uky.edu%7Cbcb03cc70efb4310baa008d9e5a1af78%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637793305471937643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=z5Gy2dRnqungWzTbYFsSj7lBJj49lwpOsfVahfx8hlU%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://attw.org/pipermail/attw-l_attw.org/attachments/20220201/47e0bb37/attachment-0002.htm>