[ATTW-L] [External] social justice in technical editing texts?

Wed Feb 2 17:11:07 UTC 2022

thanks for these resources! i do think that the "Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices <https://tinyurl.com/reviewheuristic>: A heuristic for editors, reviewers, and authors” project is ongoing, and it cites resources and scenarios and ways that reviewers can advocate for writers, even when the overall decision is to reject or revise and resubmit. the list of contributors is already impressive. highly recommend; will use again and again. 

i’m currently thinking of giving my students the option to help me build something similar to the “Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices” project, and i’ll invite the larger TCR/ATTW community to participate when we’ve got something that people can contribute to. i’m gonna make your dream come true. ;-)

best, r. 

ryan or rylish moeller

associate professor
technical communication & rhetoric
department of english
utah state university

pronouns: he.him.his

> On Feb 1, 2022, at 10:37 AM, Joseph Robertshaw <jwr0015 at uah.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> This is not a path to a copy of the outstanding Rude & Eaton Book. It is a collection of just a few links to Items I have located on the interwebs that can serve as supplemental and/or motivational materials for editing students. My hope is that some folks find it useful. My dream is that someone who has more time than I do is inspired to start a public collection of similar information.
> 
> Sorry I don't have time to annotate or describe these links:
> http://www.writing.engr.psu.edu/ <http://www.writing.engr.psu.edu/>  
> 
> https://youtu.be/8Gv0H-vPoDc <https://youtu.be/8Gv0H-vPoDc> 
> 
> http://www.schoolhouserock.tv/Grammar.html <http://www.schoolhouserock.tv/Grammar.html> 
> 
> https://sherpablog.marketingsherpa.com/marketing/content-marketing-subject-matter-experts-questions/ <https://sherpablog.marketingsherpa.com/marketing/content-marketing-subject-matter-experts-questions/>  
> 
> https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/index.html <https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/index.html> 
> 
> https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ui-design/beginners-guide-to-typography/ <https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ui-design/beginners-guide-to-typography/>
> https://www.basic-english-grammar.com/8-types-of-prepositions-in-english-grammar-with-examples.html/ <https://www.basic-english-grammar.com/8-types-of-prepositions-in-english-grammar-with-examples.html/> 
> 
> https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/grammar/verbs/what-is-mood-in-grammar.html <https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/grammar/verbs/what-is-mood-in-grammar.html>  
> 
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/collaborate-in-word-b3d7f2af-c6e9-46e7-96a7-dabda4423dd7 <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/collaborate-in-word-b3d7f2af-c6e9-46e7-96a7-dabda4423dd7>  
> 
> https://www.zotero.org/download/ <https://www.zotero.org/download/>  
> 
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/the-styles-advantage-in-word-b4a6372f-188c-93cb-831b-c4dd0cb3a881 <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/the-styles-advantage-in-word-b4a6372f-188c-93cb-831b-c4dd0cb3a881>
> Best,
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:08 AM Stephen Bernhardt <sab at udel.edu <mailto:sab at udel.edu>> wrote:
> The important aspect of Carolyn’s textbook is it’s comprehensive coverage of a professional editor’s roles and skills. A lot of those skills are very particular. Editing demands close understanding of syntax, style, and punctuation. Some editorial tasks require complex markup and command of style sheets, templates, and levels of edit. You won’t get that kind of systematic detail in a collection of readings.
> 
> For what it's worth, my Writing at Work: Professional Writing Skills for People on the Job is miraculously still in print and generating sales, with some loyal adopters. We give close coverage to analyzing the writing situation, understanding syntax, style, and punctuation, and it is packaged with a set of exercises. This book does not cover the roles and specific skills of the professional editor, but it does work very well with students who need foundational understanding of how sentences work.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:42 AM Josephine Walwema <walwema at uw.edu <mailto:walwema at uw.edu>> wrote:
> Dear ryan,
> 
> I am sorry to hear that the Rude Editing text has been discontinued. I am responding because I am very much interested in resources for editing and I hope folks come through as they always do.
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> 
> 
> Josie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> JOSEPHINE WALWEMA PhD.  
> 
> Interdisciplinary Writing Program
> Department of English | A101 Padelford Hall
> 
> https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-9308 <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-9308>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This is a public, university-owned email account and subject to an Open Records request through the Freedom of Information Act at any time. Correspondence of a personal nature should be sent to: jwalwema at gmail.com <mailto:jwalwema at gmail.com>
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:35 PM ryan moeller <rylish.moeller at gmail.com <mailto:rylish.moeller at gmail.com>> wrote:
> hi all, 
> 
> i’m currently teaching USU’s graduate-level “Advanced Editing” course, and i’ve overhauled it to have a social justice focus. for example, we are talking about ways that an editor acts as a reader advocate or a user experience designer for texts of all sorts and across multiple modalities; instead of style guides, we are investigating social justice focused style guides <https://ideasonfire.net/journal-style-guide/>; and we are interrogating editing practices (like adherence to “correctness” or “rules") that have been shown not to help struggling writers improve their writing or have been shown to have fallen out of use or favor among various audiences. 
> 
> back in the before times when i was deciding on course textbooks, i chose Rude & Eaton’s Technical Editing, (5th Edition), for its emphasis on readers’ needs over correctness or grammar rules. the textbook publisher, Pearson, allowed me to place the book order from their website <https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Rude-Technical-Editing-5th-Edition/PGM100003100757.html?tab=overview> (that in no way indicated then nor does it indicate now that the text has been discontinued), my bookstore didn’t have any problem adopting it, and my students haven’t had trouble purchasing the text. however, i requested an desk copy through the publisher’s website twice, and i received no response. when i contacted my Pearson publishing representative, they told me that since the book is out of date (2014), they would not send me a pdf or electronic version of the publication, nor would they request a desk copy or exam copy for me. their suggestion was to look for a more up-to-date textbook and sent me a link to Pearson’s entire catalog. 
> 
> leaving the problematics of customer service and maybe the error of my reliance on older publishing models whereby instructors didn’t have to purchase their own textbooks aside, the situation that i find myself in has me thinking that i may have missed some great resources on editing over the last few years. here’s a list of a few that i have become aware of and am using in class to supplement the Rude & Eaton text, but if you know of others, will you please DM me with those resources? i will happily compile a list in my course bibliography and share it with everyone who is interested. 
> 
> Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices: A heuristic for editors, reviewers, and authors. (2021). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/reviewheuristic <https://tinyurl.com/reviewheuristic>.
> Baker, M.J., Nightingale, E.M., & Bills, S. (2021). An editing process for blind or visually impaired editors. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(3), 275–287.
> Cabezas, P., Spinuzzi, C., Sabaj, O., & Varas, G. (2020). Editing the pitch: Patterns of editing strategies of written pitches in a Chilean accelerator program. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(4), 296–310.
> Fisher Saller, C. (2016). The subversive copy editor (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
> Itchuaqiyaq, C.U., & Walton, R. (2021). Reviewer as activist: Understanding academic review through Conocimiento. Rhetoric Review, 40(4), 378-394.
> Jones, N.N., & Williams, M.F. (2017). The social justice of plain language: A critical approach to plain-language analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 412–429.
> Meloncon, L. (2019). A Field-Wide View of Undergraduate and Graduate Editing Courses in Technical and Professional Communication Programs, in Editing in the Modern Classroom (pp. 171-191). 
> 
> i’m also considering whether turning these course materials into a textbook would be helpful to others of you, and whether anyone else is working on Editing for Social Justice projects that i can endorse or support or collaborate on?
> 
> thanks! 
> 
> ryan or rylish moeller
> 
> associate professor
> technical communication & rhetoric
> department of english
> utah state university
> 
> pronouns: he.him.his
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ATTW-L mailing list
> ATTW-L at attw.org <mailto:ATTW-L at attw.org>
> http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org <http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org>
> _______________________________________________
> ATTW-L mailing list
> ATTW-L at attw.org <mailto:ATTW-L at attw.org>
> http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org <http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org>
> -- 
> Steve Bernhardt
> Bayside DE
> _______________________________________________
> ATTW-L mailing list
> ATTW-L at attw.org <mailto:ATTW-L at attw.org>
> http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org <http://attw.org/mailman/listinfo/attw-l_attw.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://attw.org/pipermail/attw-l_attw.org/attachments/20220202/1e039387/attachment-0002.htm>